Seeing more is useful. Knowing what to do with what you’re seeing is where it starts to make a difference. I see this regularly when organisations start sending OT security data into their Security Operations Centre (SOC). On paper, it makes perfect sense. More visibility. More monitoring. More alerts. Better coverage of the OT environment.…
View details
OT cybersecurity budgets are rarely unlimited. There is always something else that could be improved. Another system that needs attention. Another site. Another control. Another risk somebody wants addressed. So one of the most important questions isn’t: What should we buy next? It’s: Where will the next pound actually make a difference? That sounds obvious.…
View details
One of the easiest ways to slow down an OT cybersecurity improvement is to get stuck deciding who owns it. I saw this with a food manufacturer that needed to introduce separation between its IT and OT networks. Everyone agreed a firewall was needed. What stalled progress was ownership. Engineering wanted authority over connectivity to…
View details
Most cybersecurity conversations start with technology. In OT, I think we need to start somewhere else. Earlier this year, I opened the OT Defenders Summit in London with a keynote called The State of OT Defence: From Cyber Controls to Operational Resilience. My job was to set the scene for the day. Rather than talk…
View details
OT Remote Access is a Trust-Boundary Problem. When OT teams discuss remote access, they often begin with the wrong questions. The conversation quickly turns to MFA, session recording, PAM integration, centralised management, or whether the product claims to follow Zero Trust principles. These features may matter, but they do not explain what kind of remote…
View details
What Does a Realistic OT Cybersecurity Baseline Actually Look Like? From Reflection to Action by an OT Cybersecurity Practitioner Across the previous series (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 & Part 4), I reflected on governance behaviour, visibility gaps, incentives, and the tendency to wait for perfection. A consistent theme emerged: maturity stalls not because…
View details
Progress Beats Perfection in OT Cybersecurity Reflections from an OT Cybersecurity Practitioner Across the previous parts of this series (Part 1, Part 2 & Part 3), I’ve reflected on recurring patterns that shape OT cybersecurity maturity far more than technology alone. Governance structures influence intent. Visibility determines the quality of decisions. Incentives quietly guide behaviour. Taken…
View details
Actions Follow Incentives, Not Policies Reflections from an OT Cybersecurity Practitioner In Part 1 and Part 2 of this series, I reflected on how OT cybersecurity maturity is shaped more by governance, visibility, and decision-making than by technology. A third pattern that emerges repeatedly across OT environments is the role of incentives, particularly the gap…
View details
The Visibility Gap in OT Cybersecurity Reflections from an OT Cybersecurity Practitioner In Part 1 of this series, I reflected on why OT cybersecurity maturity is often constrained by governance behaviour, incentives, and decision-making rather than technology. One related theme that repeatedly surfaces in practice is the issue of management visibility, specifically, the gap between…
View details
Governance, Not Technology, Is Holding OT Cybersecurity Back Reflections from an OT Cybersecurity Practitioner After another year delivering OT cybersecurity services and solutions, one observation continues to surface, a pattern repeated consistently over time. While technology is often challenging, OT cybersecurity maturity is more often constrained by governance behaviour, organisational incentives, and how decisions are…
View details